Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 10:14:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates?  (Read 1494 times)
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,198


« on: March 17, 2023, 10:31:13 PM »

Partisans believe anytime one of their candidates lose it must be because of candidate quality not because the voters rejected their party's ideology.

When they got into the race both Oz and Lake were considered strong recruits by many. Oz was the dream of the everyday housewife, a good looking celebrity doctor who hung out with Oprah. Lake was a well known TV anchor who was the darling of Trumpists. More than one right wing talking head mentioned her as a possible 2024 VP pick. They both turned out to be sh**tty candidates but they were not considered to be weak until after the election.

BTW even if Oz had run a better campaign I don't think he beats Fetterman. If Lake had been less crazy she probably wins though.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.