Office of Chairman TNF: Red Army takes NM, UT, ID, AZ (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 06:00:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Office of Chairman TNF: Red Army takes NM, UT, ID, AZ (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Office of Chairman TNF: Red Army takes NM, UT, ID, AZ  (Read 72808 times)
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,522


« on: April 29, 2013, 03:48:03 PM »

Looking through your policy ideas, there are some I definitely disagree with you on (fracking, nuclear energy, etc.), while even more I share the same sentiments about (Institute of Science, MEA, etc.). You will definitely be an asset to the region if elected, so consider yourself endorsed!
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,522


« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2013, 08:41:30 PM »

You have my support as usual, Senator. Smiley
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,522


« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2014, 06:05:27 PM »

Senator TNF,

How many more liberals do you think need to register in the Midwest before your re-election campaign is assured victory?

I'm confused. So you are now opposed to people of different political persuasions than yours registering in the Midwest?

Huh
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,522


« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2014, 06:19:16 PM »

Senator TNF,

How many more liberals do you think need to register in the Midwest before your re-election campaign is assured victory?

I'm confused. So you are now opposed to people of different political persuasions than yours registering in the Midwest?

Huh
That's not what I said at all - quit twisting my words.

Also, it would be nice if the Senator would spend a little more time actually debating legislation and a little less time coming up with silly lyrics that attacks his opponents.

No one is twisting your words, so there's no need to play victim here. Your passive-aggressive shtick is just getting a bit too hackneyed.

I'm also confused as to why you're attacking TNF's activity record of all things. Whether or not you like the rhetoric he uses, he has consistently been among the two or three most active, if not the most active, Senator since he was elected in June of last year. He's certainly more active than you or I.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.