California High-Speed Rail Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:20:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  California High-Speed Rail Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: California High-Speed Rail Thread  (Read 26207 times)
Link
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,426
« on: November 30, 2013, 11:51:04 AM »

That is just a mortgage amortization formula. At 5% interest per annum, paying $114 million a year, or about  $9.5 million per month, $6.5 billion can be paid back in 27 years. The bridge pencils - and pays for itself. This assumes that the $114 million represents net revenues.

It's not.  Your calculation ignores salaries and maintenance on an 8+ mile long heavily used toll bridge.  That revenue number is even with cars paying $6 during peak on weekdays and $5 on weekends.

If Texas wasn't so anti-public services, it would actually be the best place in terms of major US cities and flat cheap empty land to try high speed rail in the US.  Dallas-Waco-Austin-San Antonio-Corpus Christi and El Paso-Midland-Austin-Houston would connect 90% of the state at the capital with clear interstate expansions on all sides (Tucson, OKC, NO)

Let's see... American Airlines headquarters... Fort Worth.  Southwest Airlines headquarters... Dallas.  Continental Airlines headquarters... Houston (recently moved to Chicago after merger).  Rail ain't gonna happen in Texas. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.