US Stocks Down 15% in 2 Weeks (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:29:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  US Stocks Down 15% in 2 Weeks (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: US Stocks Down 15% in 2 Weeks  (Read 7337 times)
rwoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
« on: August 08, 2011, 03:46:38 PM »

Well done Congress ... well done.
Logged
rwoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2011, 04:00:33 PM »

John Boehner said he got 98% of what he wanted with the Debt Ceiling Deal.  Long story short, the Republican plans brought us to the blood letting of the last 2 weeks.

Obama was an idiot for trusting that the Republicans wouldn't trash the economy in an attempt to benefit themselves politically.  He should have linked the renewal of the Bush tax cuts back in December to raising the Debt Ceiling.

Long story short, Obama is a trusting fool who doesn't "get it".  Boehner and the Republicans are borderline traitors who were willing to drive us to a point where, during a time of war, we would be unable to pay our soldiers.
Logged
rwoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2011, 05:31:39 PM »

Our downgrade has everything to do with Obama massively increasing spending while cutting taxes.
 

Seriously?  Obama was responsible for about $1.44 trillion vs Bush's $5.07 trillion.  Heck, the Bush tax cuts alone cost us $1.8 trillion.
Logged
rwoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2011, 08:36:24 PM »

Our downgrade has everything to do with Obama massively increasing spending while cutting taxes.
 

Seriously?  Obama was responsible for about $1.44 trillion vs Bush's $5.07 trillion.  Heck, the Bush tax cuts alone cost us $1.8 trillion.

Multiply that  $1.44 trillion by four.  Bush had eight fiscal years, Obama's had two.  S & P also pointed that out.

You have to increase revenue and cut spending (I'd say cut more of the latter, as that obviously didn't work).

To be fair, it has been 2 1/2 years of Obama so it should be multiplied by 3.2 (bringing it to $4.6 trillion).  Waaaaay too much but still less than Bush.

I agree that you have to increase revenue and cut spending.  Unfortunately the Republicans in Congress said they wouldn't let him increase revenues.

So yeah, the leadership from both parties are to blame.  The Democrats I blame for their stupidity and the Republicans I blame for, well, for lack of a better term, their treason.
Logged
rwoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2011, 12:35:58 PM »

Our downgrade has everything to do with Obama massively increasing spending while cutting taxes.
 

Seriously?  Obama was responsible for about $1.44 trillion vs Bush's $5.07 trillion.  Heck, the Bush tax cuts alone cost us $1.8 trillion.

1)  Obama wasted a nearly a trillion dollars on a failed "stimulus" program, alone. That, and other spending increases, and tax cuts, caused the downgrade. No matter how much you claim Bush was the one that loaded up the camel, the fact remains that it was Obama that placed the straw that broke the camel's back [the trillion dollar stimulus,tax cuts,etc.] He should have reasonably known that the debt and deficit levels was too high, and acted to hold the line. Instead, he went on a spending orgy that cost this nation its AAA credit rating.

It isn't a matter of "claiming" that Bush loaded the camel ... it is fact.  I think we disagree about what broke the camel's back though.

All the credit rating does is measure the probability that the creditor will pay.  Historically there has been nothing safer in the world than US treasuries.  However, when with the latest fiasco Congress showed that they have some members who just may be crazy and stupid enough to actually default.  THAT is what broke the camel's back ... the shaken trust.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

True, but it is reasonable to make assumptions based on historical performance.
Logged
rwoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2011, 09:28:32 PM »

Oh BigSkyBob,

No doubt Bush place one-time loads on the camel to fight wars in the Middle-East, and he placed a ongoing burden to fund the medicare prescription benefit, "No child left behind," and, the ongoing costs for wounded soldiers. 

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were "one-time loads"?  So they are over?  Oh wait ... nope, those quagmires are still going.  And while the Afghan was unavoidable, the Iraq war was totally unnecessary.  The medicare was $180 billion.  Bush had $608 billion in spending on non-defense discretionary spending.  There was another $224 billion in the TARP bailouts. 

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What?  You've gotta go back to the 1960s?  Heck, why not blame FDR for the New Deal?  Or the Founding Fathers for breaking with Britain?  Bush's policies directly impact the current economy.


Obama's tax subsidy scheme is going to be another financial blackhole like medicare and medicaid. Employers are going to look at the subsidy and say, "Why should I provide subsidized health insurance [for low-wage workers] if the government would do it for me if I dropped my plan?" And, this is not to mention the trillion for the failed "stimulus" bill, and the costs of "surging" the war in Afghanistan, bombing Libya, nation-building in Iraq, and the ongoing costs for soldiers wounded in his wars.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

True, but it is reasonable to make assumptions based on historical performance.
[/quote]

True, but, that score is not based on reasonable assumptions. 
[/quote]

Just because you don't like the #'s doesn't make them any less valid.  But don't take my word for it.  Google "cost of bush tax cuts" and read article after article after article.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.