Oh BigSkyBob,
No doubt Bush place one-time loads on the camel to fight wars in the Middle-East, and he placed a ongoing burden to fund the medicare prescription benefit, "No child left behind," and, the ongoing costs for wounded soldiers.
The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were "one-time loads"? So they are over? Oh wait ... nope, those quagmires are still going. And while the Afghan was unavoidable, the Iraq war was totally unnecessary. The medicare was $180 billion. Bush had $608 billion in spending on non-defense discretionary spending. There was another $224 billion in the TARP bailouts.
What? You've gotta go back to the 1960s? Heck, why not blame FDR for the New Deal? Or the Founding Fathers for breaking with Britain? Bush's policies directly impact the current economy.
Obama's tax subsidy scheme is going to be another financial blackhole like medicare and medicaid. Employers are going to look at the subsidy and say, "Why should I provide subsidized health insurance [for low-wage workers] if the government would do it for me if I dropped my plan?" And, this is not to mention the trillion for the failed "stimulus" bill, and the costs of "surging" the war in Afghanistan, bombing Libya, nation-building in Iraq, and the ongoing costs for soldiers wounded in his wars.
True, but it is reasonable to make assumptions based on historical performance.
[/quote]
True, but, that score is not based on reasonable assumptions.
[/quote]
Just because you don't like the #'s doesn't make them any less valid. But don't take my word for it. Google "cost of bush tax cuts" and read article after article after article.