Would a Parliamentary system work better for the USA than the current system (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 02:31:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Would a Parliamentary system work better for the USA than the current system (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Parliamentary system for the US?
#1
Yay
 
#2
Nay
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: Would a Parliamentary system work better for the USA than the current system  (Read 628 times)
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« on: November 05, 2014, 08:41:54 PM »

It's not so much gridlock as it is incoherence. It's pretty rare to have a country elect the legislature every two years. Combine that with a presidential system where you have below average turn-out in mid-presidential-term elections and you get what we have. Add a healthy amount of corruption and billions of dollars of campaign spending every cycle and it's not surprising so many people (40-60% of the population) view the elections with contempt and abstain from voting.

We could definitely use some streamlining and simplification to make the choices more meaningful. Get rid of gerrymandering. Get rid of electoral laws that lead to a two party system. Add instant run-off voting and proportional representation. Automatically register every one to vote. Etc. But what are the chances of things like that happening? Very little. The system is working quite well for the people in power. It's frustrating.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.