VT and ME in 1940 - why the slight shift to FDR? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:19:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  VT and ME in 1940 - why the slight shift to FDR? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VT and ME in 1940 - why the slight shift to FDR?  (Read 2893 times)
tinman64
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 443


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.57

P P
« on: July 08, 2005, 04:36:34 PM »

VT and ME were the two states Franklin Roosevelt lost in the 1936 election.  Clearly, both states -- as they had in 1932 -- rejected FDR and his New Deal policies.

In 1940, why did these two states show a slight swing to FDR, when many other traditional Republican states swung solidly back to the GOP fold?  Here are the examples:

1936 - Maine

Landon (R) 55.49 %
Roosevelt (D) 41.52 %

Margin: 13.97 % (R)

1940 - Maine

Willkie (R) 51.10 %
Roosevelt (D) 48.77 %

Margin: 2.33 % (R)

1936 - Vermont

Landon (R) 56.39 %
Roosevelt (D) 43.24 %

Margin: 13.15 % (R)

1940 - Vermont

Willkie (R) 54.78 %
Roosevelt (D) 44.92 %

Margin: 9.86 % (R)

FDR lost both states in 1940, of course -- but why did his percentages improve in both states?  Thanks for any answers.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.