I think I should clarify my positions on the issues while we have the time.
On activity, I have to ask: What lack of debate? We've seen the legislature amend bills and bring up a lot of issues with their views on those issues. That statement is, quite frankly, rude to think that X, Duke, PiT, or Maxwell have contributed little or nothing to the debate when we've seen the exact opposite. You've attacked me for not supporting the repeal of the three strike law or the abolishing toll roads acts (and I do support both of these),
but not once have you brought up the three strike law during this campaign, and it's a bit redundant to support the abolition of something that has been abolished already. You also attack me for not bringing up a plan in the legislature that would allow for private companies to also offer plans in the healthcare market, but the law's amendment was passed
nearly a year before I was Governor (which is a bit hypocritical, since I never saw you mention Emperor PiT for not introducing an amendment during his tenure as Emperor at all during this campaign), but I've talked to a Senator about amending the Act so private insurers can still insure people who are willing to pay for their insurance. Whether or not he will introduce it, I have no idea, but
I'm not entirely sure it's valid to amend a federal law on a regional level. My views on abortion are that it should be legal until the end of the second trimester, and that women who are victims of rape, incest, or those whose life are at risk if they give birth should be able to get an abortion anytime during the pregnancy. However,
this is yet another issue you attack me on for not providing a stance yet, where you've never even outlined your view on it during the campaign.
Secondly, I never said we're finished moving forward. We still have a lot of work to do in the South, and I will be prepared to take that on during my 2nd term.
Answering the second question, I have supported a watered-down version of the Policing the Police Act. In fact, Maxwell introduced a bill to the Legislature that I supported that would require all police officers to wear a body camera, however there was a bill such as that on the federal books that made it a redundant bill, so he withdrew it. The point I'm trying to make here is that I feel that we can go a bit further in our monitoring of police behavior so the events of police shootings that we've seen don't happen again.
We're addressing an Affirmative Consent in Post-Secondary Education-esque bill right now, contrary to Mr. DeadPrez's belief that we have little to no debate, and we've amended the hell out of it, and I think I can support the amended version
as it stands if it goes to a final vote
(PiT -- I think this answers your question).