Senator Xahar stays on as Pacific Council Speaker

[Flake]

Senator Xahar, a former Pacific Councillor, and the speaker has decided to stay on as the speaker even though he has been elected as a Senator, he hadn't announced who he would appoint as the new Pacific Council Speaker, as Pacific law states that each council speaker elects the new one. I had sent the Senator a personal message, asking who he was going to appoint as the new speaker, he had told me that:



The Senator never returned my message on why he would stay on as Speaker.

I introduced legislation to the Pacific Council to make it a requirement for the Speaker to hold an office in the Pacific Council and to not hold any other political office in Atlasia.

I do not know if that bill will pass, even though I and Pacific Councillor PJ support it, the three NM(AM) members might not support the bill, I hope they do, but Xahar is a member of NM(AM) so his influence might affect their votes.

Please contact your councilors to support this bill, as it is not right that someone who isn't even a councilor anymore has the power to govern over the council.

[Flake]

The problem is that, Xahar, you shouldn't be speaker. You should appoint it to someone who is serving as a councilman/councilwoman and I don't care if it's Kitteh or PJ or FuzzyBigFoot. They are serving for the people of the Pacific and they should be the speaker.

[Flake]

First, a game has rules - all games do, and when one participates in a game it is assumed that 1) they accept the rules and that 2) they find the game fun. When I was an undergrad we played billiards a little, for example. Now can you imagine someone coming in and saying, "You guys are boring, this game isn't loony enough," and proceeding to throw balls across the table, take the sticks, bust up the game, and hide the cue? Those people would have been put through the door head first. That's how the NM has decided to act.

All games are invented by someone willing to rewrite the rules.

Actually games are made by people who write the rules so there aren't any conflicts.

[Flake]

First, a game has rules - all games do, and when one participates in a game it is assumed that 1) they accept the rules and that 2) they find the game fun. When I was an undergrad we played billiards a little, for example. Now can you imagine someone coming in and saying, "You guys are boring, this game isn't loony enough," and proceeding to throw balls across the table, take the sticks, bust up the game, and hide the cue? Those people would have been put through the door head first. That's how the NM has decided to act.

All games are invented by someone willing to rewrite the rules.

Sure, but what y'all did is more like drawing dicks all over the rulebook and then feeding it to your pet iguana.

I like this explanation much better than mine