Georgia Republican says he might withhold electoral college vote from Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 11:08:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Georgia Republican says he might withhold electoral college vote from Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Georgia Republican says he might withhold electoral college vote from Trump  (Read 1362 times)
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,646


« on: August 03, 2016, 12:36:57 PM »

We have an electoral college for a reason; one of those reasons is to remove us a step from a direct democracy.

Obviously, the convention since 1920 or so is that all states award electors to the PV winner of the state: Maine, Nebraska, Dixiecrat shenanigans, and the occasional faithless elector notwithstanding.

That said, the system is there as an important absolute last-ditch check against the election of a crazy demagogue like Trump.  Thankfully, it's not one that we've had to use before, as the parties have generally done a good job of not picking crazy people since Aaron Burr left office.  But it's one that exists.

Whether the damage to American democracy from the resulting departure from the Electoral convention would be worse than that from electing Trump, I don't know.  But, given Georgia laws, that's up to the electors to decide by their own conscience.
I agree that the reason behind having an electoral college is very fair. However, as you've said yourself, the convention of what electors are "supposed" to do has become so solidified that an election result altered by the electors could prove even more damaging than a neurotic demagogue being awarded the victory. Beyond that, my real distaste for the college is not that it acts as a safety measure against the whims of direct democracy, but rather that it effectively distorts the demographics/interests/concerns of the voting public by reducing the amount of voters whose votes actually matter.

I think having Mr. "I think, for me, nuclear is just the power, the devastation is very important to me" in the White House would be more damaging than anything the electoral college might do.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.