Why else would you mention "even the industry supports it" in your OP?
Because it was included in the original two paragraphs of the article which is what I copied and pasted as a preview? I don't selectively edit articles when I post them.
Fair enough it seemed like that was the emphasis of the argument though.
My problem with the whole thing is that Paul's argument with this, like most other issues, is that he opposes this based on the grounds that it involves government action no matter the issue.
The argument that yourself and Ernest raised is certainly a valid one and I wouldn't necessarily disagree with it should the facts line up.