Official Fox News/Iowa GOP Debate Thread

[M]

Spreading "Jihad" across the world = Bad.

Spreading "freedom" across the world = Good.

You're right. Objectively, there's really no difference between the ideology of democracy and others like communism, fascism, Nazism and theocracy. Spreading one is just the same as another.

It's just impossible to say that one of those forms of government is any better than the next, empirically speaking.

[M]

MEMO TO RON PAUL: TERRORISM IS NOT THE SAME AS DEALING WITH THE LIKES OF THE USSR!!!!!!

The guy is idiotic with foreign policy. He will never win the nomination simply because of this fact.

Scary stuff coming from the libertarian.

Why should Iran not have nukes? Give me a reason, and I will debunk it

Iran supports Hezbollah, which has said its goal is to kill all Jews. Not all Israelis. All Jews, in the world.

A source:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/hezbollahs-goal-going-aft_b_26983.html

[M]

MEMO TO RON PAUL: TERRORISM IS NOT THE SAME AS DEALING WITH THE LIKES OF THE USSR!!!!!!

The guy is idiotic with foreign policy. He will never win the nomination simply because of this fact.

Scary stuff coming from the libertarian.

Why should Iran not have nukes? Give me a reason, and I will debunk it

Iran supports Hezbollah, which has said its goal is to kill all Jews. Not all Israelis. All Jews, in the world.

A source:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/hezbollahs-goal-going-aft_b_26983.html

That has nothing to do with nukes. Cuba wants to spread Communism throughout Africa. What else is new?

It doesn't scare you that a political entity that has pushed for the extermination of ALL JEWS in the WORLD is about to get nuclear weapons?

You wouldn't at least call it a reason why they should not have nukes?

[M]

MEMO TO RON PAUL: TERRORISM IS NOT THE SAME AS DEALING WITH THE LIKES OF THE USSR!!!!!!

The guy is idiotic with foreign policy. He will never win the nomination simply because of this fact.

Scary stuff coming from the libertarian.

Why should Iran not have nukes? Give me a reason, and I will debunk it

Iran supports Hezbollah, which has said its goal is to kill all Jews. Not all Israelis. All Jews, in the world.

A source:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/hezbollahs-goal-going-aft_b_26983.html

That has nothing to do with nukes. Cuba wants to spread Communism throughout Africa. What else is new?

It doesn't scare you that a political entity that has pushed for the extermination of ALL JEWS in the WORLD is about to get nuclear weapons?

You wouldn't at least call it a reason why they should not have nukes?

Do you honestly believe that? That the 1940's will be repeated? With NATO, the UN, and other mass alliances (SEATO, etc), a mass, international invasion would be launched (and I would support it) against Iran.

Irans leaders are evil people who only care about themselves. Thats why Iran and North Korea are building nukes---to make themselves look big and scary.

I think SEATO is defunct.

And I never said Iran would succeed, thankfully. But you asked for reasons why Iran should not have nukes. I think I have given a pretty good one.

[M]

Bachmann: but can I rebuttal?

[M]

Her first "fact" is that she is a serious candidate for president.

Ipso facto, Gingrich is right: Bachmann's facts are wrong.

[M]

Ronald Reagan also brought clarity to the his opponents.