Guys, the logic is pretty simple:
Religion A makes a claim about the world and divinity.
Religion B makes a separate claim.
Therefore Religion A and Religion B have conflicting claims.
Therefore Religion A and Religion B can not BOTH be correct.
Therefore if one adheres to Religion A, they must believe Religion B is a false religion and vice-versa.
Anyone who claims to be a Christian and doesn't believe all non-Christian religions are false must have some serious logical reasoning problems.
What a sad, blinkered view of religion you have.
You think simple logical syllogisms are sad and blinkered? Good grief.
I think that reducing religion to a competing, zero sum set of logical claims is sad and blinkered, yes.
Can you actually debunk this instead of just dismissing it?
Like if I believe in Jesus how can I believe a religion that rejects the divinity of Jesus is also true?
Please show me where Hinduism at-large -- to the extent that there even is a practical "Hinduism at-large" -- materially rejects the divinity of Jesus.
One can be a Hindu who believes in Christ, but one cannot believe in Christ and be a Hindu.
Poll
