Republican in 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 02:27:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Republican in 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Republican in 2004  (Read 5404 times)
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« on: June 23, 2004, 08:10:16 PM »
« edited: June 23, 2004, 08:57:18 PM by Akno21 »

Assume Al Gore had taken the White House, 9/11 had still happened, Gore had imposed stiff sanctions on Iraq with international support-leading to the collapse of the government, and Gore had basically done everything he said he would do.

Who would the Republicans run in 2004?
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2004, 08:25:20 PM »

That's possible, although Bush could probably buy the nomination again.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2004, 08:39:32 PM »

Yes, that is true. Or you could run someone who could win a large state Gore won, such as Rick Santurom for Pennslyvania.  
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2004, 08:55:45 PM »

Fine.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2004, 10:32:32 PM »

Bush v. McCain II in the GOP primary.  The southern fundamentalists rip McCain apart a second time and W gets the nomination.

That's what I would predict. Is there anyone else beside Bush and McCain?
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2004, 10:41:38 PM »

Keyes couldn't even win a senate slot in his home state.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2004, 11:12:12 AM »

Oregon is another place where anti-war Nader voters would draw away a lot of Gore support, I think.

Except a Gore led war would be more popular than a Bush led war, because Gore would handle it better. Thus, there wouldn't be as many anti-war supporters.
Logged
Akno21
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,066
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2004, 12:01:32 PM »

Oregon is another place where anti-war Nader voters would draw away a lot of Gore support, I think.

Except a Gore led war would be more popular than a Bush led war, because Gore would handle it better. Thus, there wouldn't be as many anti-war supporters.

Where do you get this prediction from?

Gore would have gone in with more international support, meaning the Iraqi's wouldn't be as violent against the "coalition" because it would have had more credibility. Thus, the war would be recieved better since there would be less casualties.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.