Atomic bombings of Japan (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 04:52:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Atomic bombings of Japan (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which would you have supported?
#1
Hiroshima		  
#2
Nagasaki		  
#3
Neither		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 40

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Atomic bombings of Japan  (Read 3841 times)
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,000
« on: May 07, 2006, 06:53:05 PM »
Quote from: ilikeverin on May 07, 2006, 04:43:33 PM
Both; far more US soldiers, Japanese troops, and Japanese civilians would have been killed in an amphibious invasion than were killed as a result of the atomic bombings.
^^^^^^^^^^
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,000
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2006, 06:58:28 PM »
Historians predict the war itself could have lasted through to 1947 and given the Communists more time to influence fragile war-torn Europe.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.