No.
The thing about gay people is that they are incredibly patient. We've always had to wait on each step of the rights movement from decriminalisation to marriage, on the majority deciding when it was appropriate to give us some rights. How very nice of them. So we can wait. But there will be a point when opposing it becomes indefensible. When society isn't crumbling because of it and people you know are gay and married and the vast majority of people don't even notice sexuality as a defining characteristic, those who still oppose it or wave about a leather book en lieu of using thought will join the ranks of societies greatest assholes alongside those who think women should be in the kitchen and mixed race babies are an abomination.
Well I guess I'm an asshole, because if a woman Wants to be a housewife I fail to see what is wrong with that. Many married women work because they have to not because they want to. Suppose a man wants to be a so called "housewife"? Is there anything wrong with that? So, if it's ok for a man to be a housewife why not a woman? Somehow, though, I don't think that is what you meant. Of course, I do not believe a woman should be denied the opportunity to work, in fact, most people are ready to have a woman president even if not specifically for Hillary or Palin.
You grabbed something I didn't say and ran with it
If a man thinks a woman should be in the kitchen
regardless of what the woman wants to do thereby placing his desires over hers, then he is an chauvinistic asshole. If a woman or man wishes to be a homemaker then of course that's fine.
Poll
