It returns
I have no issue with Section 1a and 1b and 1c. You know where I stand on 'd' and 'e' namely that it does not make any sense to differentiate between unions and 'small collective bargaining groups' which are by their very definition unions. Writing a non existant distinction in labour law does not make any sense. Neither, for that matter does infringing on the rights of unions (by which the writer of the bill presumably meant the 'big unions') to make their own rules by saying that non-union members are not entitled to representation. Unions can offer benefits to non-union members if they wish.
Again, it's a bill not only allowing for the provision of what is already permitted (ie, forming unions) but also bogged down with trying to make distinctions in what constitutes a union that simply does not exist.
