Family and Society (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:57:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Family and Society (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Family and Society  (Read 3651 times)
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« on: May 19, 2005, 01:46:45 PM »

On the whole, traditional families are better than alternative families. 

Is every traditional family better than every alternative family?  No.  But on average, traditional families get better results.

I would agree with this, mainly just because traditional families just tend to have more stable environments. Stability is a very important factor in raising a child, and the reason many non-traditional family units gain their structure is because of some largely destabilizing factor.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2005, 06:39:36 PM »

On the whole, traditional families are better than alternative families. 

Is every traditional family better than every alternative family?  No.  But on average, traditional families get better results.

I would agree with this, mainly just because traditional families just tend to have more stable environments. Stability is a very important factor in raising a child, and the reason many non-traditional family units gain their structure is because of some largely destabilizing factor.

You don't think love is more important than having a "traditional" family, and what makes you think that a traditional family creates a more stable children? There could be no love in a traditional family, and don't tell me traditional families are more loving.

Of course I think love is more important - but as dazzleman said we're talking trends. A single parent/two same-sex parent family that loves and cares for the child is superior to a traditional family structure in which the child is nobody cares about the child. All I'm saying is that in many cases, alternative family structures, particularly single-parent ones, are unstable not because of the structure itself, but the reasons that the family attained that structure - for instance a deadbeat dad running off, or a nasty and emotional divorce, can seriously destabilize the environment for the child, which can cause serious problems.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2005, 06:46:40 AM »

It's utterly impossible for a family without a male parent and a female parent to function normally.

No Jake, you're wrong. After my father died, my single mother was able to raise me just fine, thank you very much.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2005, 05:56:17 PM »

Aspects of the nontraditional family that are essential ingredients for poverty:

1. Head of household is a female, of any age.

I don't want to sound PC, but that doesn't really apply to contribution to poverty. For almost my whole life my mom made more money than my dad - and he was no slouch, he made a fair amount.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2005, 06:57:47 PM »

I thought I had meant sole head of household is a female of any age, but just in case...

I could go on to qualify myself further--an original two-parent household becoming a single-mother household through divorce, widowhood, separation and mutual hatred, etc.--but that seems to me to fall more under the "dysfunctional parents" catagory.

All the same, a woman, teenage or otherwise, who has a child with no intentions of including the father as a responsible parent (i.e., the "baby daddy") is almost condemning her child to poverty

My mother has been the sole head of the household since I was 12 or so; we haven't had any financial problems because of it.  I would agree that it is perhaps detrimental to the child's upbringing not to have a father figure to balance the mother (although it wasn't in my case), but I don't see how there's any correlation between the female being the head of the household and the family having financial troubles.

Mine since my dad died when I was 10. Female head of household, single or otherwise, does not in my experience in of itself cause poverty.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2005, 06:58:51 PM »

It's utterly impossible for a family without a male parent and a female parent to function normally.

No Jake, you're wrong. After my father died, my single mother was able to raise me just fine, thank you very much.

John, you became a libertarian. Something went wrong somewhere Cheesy

Yes, it's wrong to care about my freedom and the freedom of others. Wink
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2005, 07:03:28 AM »

If you don't know many married people, how did you come to such a bizarre conclusion?

Everyone I know has parents, and nearly all hate them, or at best have a love/hate relationship.  I think I know one or two that are mutually indifferent.

That's simply because of the crowd you hang out with - probably a good deal of spoiled rich kids such as yourself. Most people I know love their parents, including myself.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.