I agree that Paul was the more widely traveled, which contributed to the survival of Pauline Christianity after the First and Second Jewish Wars.
“Pauline” Christianity, you mean the Christianity that Paul preached , the EXACT same message that Peter and James agreed 100% with at the Jerusalem Council in Acts ch 15, was “Pauline” Christianity?
Now, that’s an odd statement. But, if that were true, then why did Peter and James agree 100% with what Paul was teaching?
Also, if you want to thrown forth some examples where “Pauline” Christianity differed from what Peter and James taught, please do so.You could argue that Paul, Peter, and james agreed on their beliefs and you may well be right, but you are neglecting the fact that there were other early Christian sects. For instance there was
Marcionism, or the
Ebionites. I'm sure you're also aware of the other writings and books of early Christians that did not make it into the Bible. So when he says "Pauline" Christianity he's either referring to what made it into the canonical Bible or something of that nature.
