The Empathy of Mittens (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 06:20:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Empathy of Mittens (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: The Empathy of Mittens  (Read 6245 times)
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


« Reply #25 on: September 15, 2012, 01:32:44 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

O+2 R-2. Think vector notation. Romney needs to gain 2 points to tie Obama, since a gain for Romney will be the same as a loss for Obama.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

And yet, you won't accept an appeal to definition when it concerns statistical significance. Wink

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So you're willing to be 20:1 odds that the next flip is heads?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is why there's no correlation. It is, as I stated before, a mathematical equivalency. Not arbitrary whatsoever and is fundamentally connected with sample size.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Weak correlation is when you have multiple studies, some with statistical significance, and some without.

Glad I could help you pass your stats class!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.