Corrected for "the calendar," Mittens running 4-6% better than McCain in 2008 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 11:13:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Corrected for "the calendar," Mittens running 4-6% better than McCain in 2008 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Corrected for "the calendar," Mittens running 4-6% better than McCain in 2008  (Read 3541 times)
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,136
United States


« on: March 16, 2012, 09:59:08 PM »
I think this is a pretty clear sign that Mitt Romney is a very weak presidential nominee.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,136
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2012, 08:42:00 PM »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Obama - sure.

Clinton 1992? No. Clinton didn't lose 10 states.

Reagan in 1980? Same deal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.