Can someone explain this logic to me?

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wow, what a facile assessment.

Let's see.

AZ - blowout - confirms your assessment.

ME - wasn't going to be a factor there
WA - pulled out 5 delegates (safe Mitt)
MI - Push.
WY - Push.

So out of 5 states - none of which have been lean Santorum, he pulled out 2 pushes. That's not great, but he's certainly a serious candidate.

I really can't see why Mitt fans are stating that Santorum is not a serious candidate? Really? Get back to me how many Republican candidates win 4 states.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Coming from someone who's -4 on Social, this is a laugh.

Opposition to Abortion is hardly against the mainstream. Obama supports abortion and supports making it mandatory for abortion coverage in america.

The only candidate who hasn't come out in support for mandatory health care coverage is Santorum.

Newt is under the delusion that he can 'fix it'. He's perfectly happy to screw young folks over and if it means abortion coverage along the way - who cares? So long as it's got his name on it he's got it.

Romney's already done it.

So that leaves us with exactly one candidate opposed to mandatory coverage. Ugh!

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Bias alert.

'in reality' attached to any statement with sour grapes.