Sorry

[Adam Griffin]

Fool me once etc.

You should've had to common courtesy to see that you might not be as active as you can, and given up a sponsorships so that the Senate can do its work. If you've had some issues, sorry about that, but really, I think it was kind of a slap in the face of those that want to do things here that you did that. Just straight up.

Pretty much. Look, I'm not mad at you like you suggested last night - you haven't really done anything to merit that for awhile - but as Nix very vaguely suggested, this is a song and dance that we've seen several times. Since I'd rather be light-hearted and detailed as opposed to drawn-out and verbose (and because any image I make is bound to actually be read), I put together this graph that details what I've been witnessing since late 2012.

[Adam Griffin]

Ooh! Make one for Xahar next.

Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the Labor Party the primary reason Xahar pulled off the upset? Seems kind of ironic to be going after Napoleon with such vengeance.

I'm certainly not being vengeful - just a historian. I remember several of us discussed this very same concept via PM probably three months ago when the last instance of this topic was created. Napoleon drops off the radar, comes back and apologizes, says he may leave the game, gets people to sympathize, shortly thereafter announces his candidacy, runs for re-election and wins. I'm just outlining the roles in this great cyclical process.

[Adam Griffin]

Hey Griffin can you do one of me?

You'll have to get to the Senate first.