Quantitative Easing (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:43:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Quantitative Easing (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Quantitative Easing  (Read 2838 times)
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« on: November 04, 2010, 02:40:57 PM »

They're almost intent on keeping the funds within the financial sector. Why would they 'spread it out'?

But the point is that it can't do any good in the financial sector ('pushing on a string').  If it were sent outside that sector it would be spent, thus actually having a growth effect.

Apparently no one at the Fed has studied the great Depression or Japan.

Given that the Japanese invented QE and given Bernanke's reserach background...lol.

They don't want to redistribute wealth, only increase liquidity (that is oversimplifying a little bit of course)
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,783


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2010, 01:55:44 PM »

I'm studying Solow right now.

I'd say empirical evidence actually gives a lot of support for Solow. If you have completely messed up institutions (like Africa) you won't see convergence, but as soon as a country takes care of that they do catch up. We've seen this in many countries, especially in Asia.

It's also important to note that once a country gets into gear they start to catch up. Look at China for instance.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.