Tax (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 09:32:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Tax (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Tax  (Read 7357 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: September 22, 2004, 09:52:41 PM »

what % of a national sales tax would have to be to replace the income tax.  

It depends upon what all gets covered.  It could be as low as 10% if everything were covered including the sale of labor (i.e. an earned wages tax.)  Once you start exempting whole categories of the GDP from being taxed, the rate on what remains would need to be increased.  Assuming a sales tax on just the items traditionally covered by such a tax, you're getting up into the 30% range.  (Assuming the percentage is reported as it traditionially is, as an addition to the quoted price.  If you do it as the proponets of the self-described Fair Tax do, as a percentage of the total amount paid by the buyer for the good or service, then you get numbers in the 23% range.)  The biggest problem with switching to a national sales tax instead of an national income tax, is that if it is done quickly, the shock to our economy would probably be devastating while agradual change that gave people time to adjust to the new system would likely get stuck midway, leaving us with both taxes.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2021, 07:31:46 PM »

I still stand by what I said way back then.

what % of a national sales tax would have to be to replace the income tax.  

It depends upon what all gets covered.  It could be as low as 10% if everything were covered including the sale of labor (i.e. an earned wages tax.)  Once you start exempting whole categories of the GDP from being taxed, the rate on what remains would need to be increased.  Assuming a sales tax on just the items traditionally covered by such a tax, you're getting up into the 30% range.  (Assuming the percentage is reported as it traditionally is, as an addition to the quoted price.  If you do it as the proponents of the self-described Fair Tax do, as a percentage of the total amount paid by the buyer for the good or service, then you get numbers in the 23% range.)  The biggest problem with switching to a national sales tax instead of an national income tax, is that if it is done quickly, the shock to our economy would probably be devastating while a gradual change that gave people time to adjust to the new system would likely get stuck midway, leaving us with both taxes.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2021, 09:59:25 PM »

Cut taxes for most people, raise them on the top 0.1%. Implement $0.01 on ever dollar over $50-100 million.

Introduce a student deduction so that college students don't have to deal with paying taxes in addition to overpriced everything.

Introduce a negative income tax for the poorest 1-2%.

We already have one. It's called the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2021, 02:43:16 AM »

-  Dividends should be income tax rate - corporate tax rate to avoid double taxation

Why?

The limited liability of corporations is a reasonable basis for corporate income to be more highly taxed than individual income.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.