SCOTUS to hear Second Amendment case (District of Columbia v. Heller) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 06:03:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  SCOTUS to hear Second Amendment case (District of Columbia v. Heller) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SCOTUS to hear Second Amendment case (District of Columbia v. Heller)  (Read 5381 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: November 21, 2007, 08:41:39 PM »

James Madison really screwed up with the wording of the 2nd Amendment. It seems to be a sentence with two unrelated independent clauses.

Depends on whether you read the version passed by Congress:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Or the version sent to the States for ratification:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Without the extra comma, the text is clearer.  In any case, don't blame Madison alone.  His original version read:
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country; but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.