Ernest v. Gabu III (or is it IV, I've lost count)

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

What the heck, let's have a nice lawsuit after all.

May it please the honorable Supreme Court of Atlasia.  I bring suit seeking the result of the election held the weekend of June 22 to 24 be amended.  Specificially, I seek that the vote of Defarge be declared invalid as he did not meet the activity requirement of 15 posts during the 56 days preceding the opening of the election booth required by Section 14 Clause 1 of the Consolidated Electoral System Reform Act as amended by the Federal Activity Requirements Revision Act.  As an inspection of the his activity record will show, Defarge's last post before the opening of the booth was made at June 10, 2007, 05:00:44 pm and he made all of 5 posts in the 56 days April 26-June21, 2007 inclusive.

I therefore further ask this court that as a result of said invalid vote, the results for the Census and the election of the Northeast Senator be amended accordingly.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Why did you wait until now to bring this up?

Because I didn't notice this until I was checking the activity levels of the voters in the runoff after the runoff was certified.  (Indeed, I only checked the activity levels of the runoff voters.) By the way, Defarge does have enough activity for the runoff election, so if this suit should be tossed out for some reason, it doesn't affect the runoff directly.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Two of us are in agreement on an opinion; I'll wait a little for the third Justice to weigh in. For the sake of recordkeeping, this is really just Ernest v Gabu II, right?

It should be "Ernest v. Department of Forum Affairs," like the other election-related cases.

I thought the usual form for these sorts of cases is to use the name of the officer in charge of the department as defendant.