True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 42,144
![](./avatars/Democratic/D_SC.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: December 09, 2005, 01:51:42 AM » |
|
I apologize for not being more active. I concur with the end result, but not the entirety of the reasoning. However, I don't feel like boring others or myself with the erudite pomposity that would have considered a third option, two-thirds of the number of Senate seats, only to conclude that there was no basis for a decision between two thirds of Senators and two-thirds of Senate seats.
|