I support the original sin view, but I'm surprised at the late ages some of you are quoting. I've seen my two year old niece break the eighth commandment
Do you think a two year old girl has the cognitive capacity to understand that taking things from someone else is 'usually' a wrong thing to do? Are you aware that to a toddler, possession means ownership. They essentially have a 'right' to anything within grabbing distance and that generally speaking under four, never mind two they difficulty distinguishing between what is 'mine' and what is 'yours' (or not theirs). The concept of 'stealing' as opposed to 'taking' does not apply to them. How on earth are they breaking any rule?
So sin requires recognition by the doer that they have done wrong? You seem to be taking the opposite position in
another thread, tho not as stridently as some others in that thread. Altho to be fair, most people in that thread seem to be taking the position that sin occurs not when the doer recognizes they've done something wrong, but when they themselves see the doer doing something they perceive as wrong. (To be clear, in that particular tragedy I think the parents sinned against the child, and the child sinned against the trucker, tho in neither case did they undertake their action with the intent of sinning.)