NC election officials identify hundreds of potential voter fraud cases

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Multiple voting is no doubt the easiest method of fraud.  It's also one that voter ID does nothing to address.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

The cheaters already won. Their 2012 votes won't be invalidated.

They did?

https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/index.html

Unless you're claiming these cheats were primarily Romney voters.

We have no way of knowing. All we do know is that these cheaters have permanently corrupted the overall vote totals.

Well, there's only several hundred individuals with matching names and SSNs that voted in multiple states. The over35k others are merely people with the same name and birthdate as someone who voted in another state. I don't believe that all of those are mere coincidences, but I suspect there are many instances of multiple (e.g.) "Mark Smith's born 1/1/60" voting in both NC and elsewhere in the other 49 states which explains the large majority of that category.

With a rough order of 10,000 people in this country who share each date of birth, it wouldn't necessarily require common names to get coincidental matches.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Well, there's only several hundred individuals with matching names and SSNs that voted in multiple states. The over35k others are merely people with the same name and birthdate as someone who voted in another state. I don't believe that all of those are mere coincidences, but I suspect there are many instances of multiple (e.g.) "Mark Smith's born 1/1/60" voting in both NC and elsewhere in the other 49 states which explains the large majority of that category.

With a rough order of 10,000 people in this country who share each date of birth, it wouldn't necessarily require common names to get coincidental matches.

I agree. My point exactly.

"Mark Smith" is a rare name?

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Well, there's only several hundred individuals with matching names and SSNs that voted in multiple states. The over35k others are merely people with the same name and birthdate as someone who voted in another state. I don't believe that all of those are mere coincidences, but I suspect there are many instances of multiple (e.g.) "Mark Smith's born 1/1/60" voting in both NC and elsewhere in the other 49 states which explains the large majority of that category.

With a rough order of 10,000 people in this country who share each date of birth, it wouldn't necessarily require common names to get coincidental matches.

I agree. My point exactly.

"Mark Smith" is a rare name?

When did I say that?

First you used "Mark Smith" as your example, which didn't say anything about it being rare or common, but then when I commented that it wouldn't need to be a common name, you said that was your point exactly, which must mean that you think Mark Smith is not a common name if that was your point.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Because of course, people who are interested in committing voter fraud will magically find it more difficult to obtain multiple photo IDs than to be placed upon multiple electoral rolls.