Supreme Court passes on I Heart Boobies Case

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

The case hinged on the lower court finding that the bracelets in question did not convey a prurient message, plus that apparently the school's dress code did allow non-prurient messages on clothing.  SCOTUS as a rule does not overturn findings of fact.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

On an unrelated note, is Mary Catherine Roper the same Roper as in Roper V. Simmons?

Rather than being lazy and asking others to do your searching for you, why don't you go find out yourself? It's not exactly a difficult thing to find out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roper_v._Simmons

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

On an unrelated note, is Mary Catherine Roper the same Roper as in Roper V. Simmons?

Rather than being lazy and asking others to do your searching for you, why don't you go find out yourself? It's not exactly a difficult thing to find out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roper_v._Simmons

That was quite rude and uncalled for...

No, while it was quite rude, it was also quite called for.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Now, now, boys, let's not have any fighting in here. We wouldn't want NYE to spread, now, would we?

Okay... I am not communicable disease, nor I am one of the Ten Plagues... I'm just a random dude sitting at a computer random typing.

Fixed that misplaced word for you.