True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 42,144
![](./avatars/Democratic/D_SC.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2014, 11:18:28 AM » |
|
That's effectively the same as retiring as it opens up a slot for appointment. Maybe if the law forced judges into senior status if they were unable to keep up a full workload, tho I don't know whether it would be constitutional to do so. I guess it depends on how one defines "good Behaviour" and whether moving to senior status would be considered "Continuance in Office" or not.
|