Australian Federal Election 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 10:35:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Australian Federal Election 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Australian Federal Election 2004  (Read 9872 times)
cwelsch
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 677


« on: June 21, 2004, 05:49:02 AM »

I dunno, Sharon wants to pull out the settlers and build a wall.  Since every country has a right to border control, the only reason to say Israel has no right to do it must stem from an argument wherein Israel has no right to exist, or at least no right to borders.

Some people will never be happy with Israel, and polls show that a lot of Europeans have anti-Semitic impulses.



Jan 27, 2004 - Jerusalem Post
Poll: Europeans 'tired of Holocaust victim games'
By JENNY HAZAN

Every third European feels Jews should stop playing "Holocaust victim" games, an Italian newspaper reported Monday. The poll came out on the eve of the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, a day Israel this year dedicated to combating anti-Semitism.

The Corriere della Sera survey of nine European countries also found that 46 percent of those interviewed feel Jews are "different," and 71% of them urged Israel to withdraw from the territories. Nine percent of respondents do not "like or trust Jews," and 15% would prefer that Israel not exist.

Just over 68% said they believed Israel has a right to exist but that the government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is "making the wrong choices."

Forty-eight percent of Europeans polled in Italy, France, Belgium, Austria, Spain, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Germany, and Britain said that Jews have "a particular relationship with money."

In all the countries, anti-Semitic sentiment was positively correlated with anti-Israel sentiment.

The number of people polled and the margin of error were not clear.

Also on Monday, the IDF General Staff held a discussion on the strategic threat posed by Islamic anti-Semitism.

On Sunday, Natan Sharansky, minister-without-portfolio for Diaspora and Jerusalem affairs, presented a report on anti-Semitism in 2003 at a Yad Vashem ceremony marking the designation of January 27 as Israel's National Day to Combat Anti-Semitism.

Unlike the 14 European countries that mark Holocaust remembrance on the 27th of this month, when Auschwitz-Birkenau was liberated by the Red Army, Israel's day of remembrance takes place on the 27th of Nisan, the anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto revolt.

"For the first time this year, we decided to mark January 27 as the day to combat anti-Semitism because we feel there is a very deep connection between remembering and facing the challenges of today," Sharansky said. "When cemeteries and synagogues are being burned and destroyed, not somewhere in the dark corners of the world, but in the middle of enlightened Europe, it is a problem that belongs to all of us."

The anti-Semitism report indicated a drop in anti-Semitic incidents worldwide alongside a dangerous convergence of traditional anti-Semitism with the new anti-Semitism which demonizes the state of Israel.

At the ceremony, attended by 15 ambassadors and representatives from 14 other embassies, Sharansky and Yad Vashem officials unveiled a lesson plan titled, "Remembering the Holocaust and Combating Xenophobia." The plan's authors hope it will be used in international high school classrooms on Holocaust remembrance days. Sharansky also sent letters to all European education ministries to request their participation in the program.

 
Logged
cwelsch
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 677


« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2004, 06:10:09 PM »

I'd only support the Australian Liberals because they're the closest thing to me, or least different.  Labor is controlled by, well, Labor.  The Greens anywhere are way into "sustainability" which basically means anti-development and anti-market central planning.  The Democrats don't strike me at all as very hands-off or free market.  The Nationals are too agrarian for my tastes.

I might just vote for the Liberal Democratic Party, the Asutralian version of the LP.  As far as I know they aren't even active in every province/territory.

I'd rather go to New Zealand, work for ACT.  A genuine libertarian party with elected MPs.
Logged
cwelsch
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 677


« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2004, 03:25:29 AM »

I understand that ACT is a little more more right than Libertarianz, and that NZ is less ideological than the US.  Regardless, I feel they deserve the label libertarian even if they are moderately so.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.