CO: Rasmussen: Udall only ahead by 3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 09:57:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 Senatorial Election Polls
  CO: Rasmussen: Udall only ahead by 3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO: Rasmussen: Udall only ahead by 3  (Read 6232 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: July 22, 2008, 04:27:46 PM »

Well, this one is ranked the most likely to be saved on the vulnerable seats list, in my opinion. That's not saying much though. I hope we can pull off an upset here to make up for the now likely loss in Alaska.

No matter how you look at it, it looks like Dems +4 at the end of the night on November 4th.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2008, 05:46:53 PM »

No matter how you look at it, it looks like Dems +4 at the end of the night on November 4th.

At a minimum.

It's pretty close to the max. They might be able to get Oregon but not much else.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2008, 09:00:19 PM »

No matter how you look at it, it looks like Dems +4 at the end of the night on November 4th.

At a minimum.

It's pretty close to the max. They might be able to get Oregon but not much else.
NM + NH + VA + CO + AK = 5. The latest poll has Merkley ahead in Oregon, making +6 possible. Then there's MS, which is close.

I said close to the max. I think five is the max. You won't get OR and we're not even going to start with MS.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2008, 12:29:43 AM »




Pictorial proof for the imagination-challenged.

Bob Schaeffer and convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff sitting in a tree....

Listen, I know you're obsessed over this photo and all so I believe that Jack is there but am I the only one who doesn't see Abramoff?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2008, 12:39:36 AM »


Jackie boy probably took the picture. Or maybe he was calling his corrupt buddies at the time when the picture was taken, Anyway, Schaffer's BFF (isn't it fun to be a hack, Phil?) is a convicted felon.

Uh...I hope I'm not being accused of being a hack here.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So devastating? Abramoff isn't even in the photo! I would love for Udall to use this so Schaffer could own him again. I'd love for him to say, "Congressman Udall, if you can point out where Jack Abramoff is in this photo, I will drop out of the race right here, right now."
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2008, 12:52:05 AM »

I think you've accused me of being a DSCC stooge and a DCCC hack. LOL. Chris Van Hollen probably thinks I'm a right-winger with an agenda if he saw how low I have IL-10 and MO-06 in my rankings.

You're constantly hyping Democratic Congressional candidates and your posts read like campaign press releases.  Tongue

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 15 queries.