Rasmussen: Lynn Swann leads Rendell by 2% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 03:11:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  Rasmussen: Lynn Swann leads Rendell by 2% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: Lynn Swann leads Rendell by 2%  (Read 12305 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: January 19, 2006, 03:04:43 PM »

If Rendell is running ads I am more worried.  But his approval is is only 46% compared to 44% who disapprove of him in the Keystone state.

Just because his approval rating is better than his disapproval doesn't mean everything is ok. That's a high disapproval and it's close to his approval.   

Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2006, 04:20:28 PM »

However, if we are talking 'a high disapproval and it's close to his approval' situation what about your idol Rick Santorum?

1) What does that have to do with anything? When you lose you need to resort to this? Typical.

2) Up until the beginning of last year, Santorum had some of the best approval ratings and lowest disapprovals.

3) I've admitted that my political idol will have a very tough challenge and, at this point, is likely to lose. I fail to see your point here except maybe trying to distract attention when you get cranky and can't argue.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2006, 06:11:05 PM »



How am I trying to distract the attention away from discussion?  You took me up on a point I had made because you misunderstood what I said.  I said that if Rendell was running ads and losing by 45%-43% and had almost equal numbers of people saying they approved and disapproved of him, he was in trouble.  My argument backs yours up then.

You wanted to turn it into an attack on Santorum. You called me out, another poster even noticed it, and then you were proven wrong again. I could care less about your Rendell argument at this point. When you want to me make this a "Gotcha!" type of discussion then I'll point out that you lost.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.