PA-PPP: Toomey leads (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 02:47:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  PA-PPP: Toomey leads (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA-PPP: Toomey leads  (Read 6219 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: January 20, 2015, 05:20:47 PM »

That amount of "no opinion" responses just doesn't make sense. But whatever. Full results:

Approval: 28% to 35%. 37% have "no opinion."

He leads Shapiro by 12%, Nutter by 7%, Kane by 6% (she led by 2-4% since taking office), Chris Matthews by 4% and Sestak by 4%.

Only one Dem leads: Rendell up by 3%...and he isn't running.

Sestak goes back to being relatively unknown with only 40% having an opinion on him.


Toomey's "moderate image" doesn't work when no one knows who he is. Key for Sestak will be to define Toomey first.

That goes both ways. Sestak doesn't have bucket loads of money to define himself or his opponent this early.

But this is all fairly moot. By the time this campaign is finished, after the insane amount of money that will be spent on advertising, Pennsylvanians will know both of them. Trust me.

40% is a terrible number for a Republican incumbent going into a presidential year

It's January...2015. Not quite "going into" 2016 yet.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2015, 03:36:24 AM »

Key finding of this poll: pbrower still absolutely clownish. Very few undecided on that point.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2015, 08:15:48 AM »

Pbrower is slobbering over 28% in one poll. And drawing comparisons to Corbett which literally no one with any sense of PA politics would do. What a sad, sad clown.

The 28% would be disastrous if, say, 50%+ disapproved. There will be plenty of defining on both side but guess which one is the incumbent with two more years in the term and more money. Hint: not Sestak.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2015, 05:14:45 PM »

They probably have a better chance of picking up an open Senate seat in California than they have of holding onto this one. 


Ok, listen, you're seriously going to get a moderator warning for trolling. It was bad enough that you said the party would essentially automatically concede the seat but this was just the icing on the cake.

But I do want to sincerely thank you for making this comment. It removes any question as to whether or not you're a total joke poster. 
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2015, 07:26:18 PM »

You certainly lack something in your head but I wouldn't say it's the imagination that's missing...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.