Christine O'Donnell (Still an Idiot - DE): "Santorum more liberal than Mitt."

[Keystone Phil]

Keep it stupid, Christine.

http://www.politico.com/cpac-video/

[Keystone Phil]

(All joking aside, he lost worse than O'Donnell.  LOL.)

Nah, he didn't.

[Keystone Phil]

If that race had taken place in a year like 2006, Coons would have had 65%.

Stop being generous to Christine.

[Keystone Phil]

(All joking aside, he lost worse than O'Donnell.  LOL.)

Nah, he didn't.

Yep, 16.58% margin for O'Donnell, 17.36% for Santorum.  And Delaware is D+7.

I was looking at the percentage each candidate received.

Christine also ran in 2010 and had a nobody opponent. Santorum had to run in 2006 against a state legend.

Sorry, but Santorum lost to a bald guy. And Santorum had the power of incumbency. How did that happen?

This "bald guy" thing might be the best new forum meme.

Being an incumbent isn't always an advantage, dumb. Especially not in 2006.

[Keystone Phil]

What the heck is this thing about Casey's hair, or rather the lack thereof?

I think we need someone to do a BRTD type signature:

The individuals pictured below are BALD:

(Mr. Clean) (Michael Jordan) (Bob Casey, Jr.)

[Keystone Phil]

So being the County Executive of the county which makes up 2/3rds of the state's population now qualifies as being a "nobody?"  Whereas a failed former gubernatorial candidate now is a "state legend?"

...

Ok, I know you aren't being serious but I'll address it anyway: Coons was relatively unknown and a definite sacrificial lamb. Casey was far more than a "failed former Gubernatorial candidate;" he's a Casey and statewide office holder.

[Keystone Phil]

So being the County Executive of the county which makes up 2/3rds of the state's population now qualifies as being a "nobody?"  Whereas a failed former gubernatorial candidate now is a "state legend?"

...

Ok, I know you aren't being serious but I'll address it anyway: Coons was relatively unknown and a definite sacrificial lamb. Casey was far more than a "failed former Gubernatorial candidate;" he's a Casey and statewide office holder.

Yeah, the Caseys are political royalty in PA, and rightfully so.

The late, great Bob Casey, Sr.? Yes.

[Keystone Phil]

Yeah, someone whose father was governor over 10 years previously and managed to win the least prestigious statewide office after losing the gubernatorial primary to an idiot really sounds like a way more formidable candidate than a two-term incumbent senator or a man serving as what is essentially mayor of an urban area that comprises 2/3rds of the state's population.

Uh...the Casey's are still legendary. Using your logic, Bill Clinton couldn't be a legend in Arkansas because he was Governor several decades ago. And he lost to someone who (smartly) ran to the left in a Democratic primary and was from the Democratic base of the state.

[Keystone Phil]

So being the County Executive of the county which makes up 2/3rds of the state's population now qualifies as being a "nobody?"  Whereas a failed former gubernatorial candidate now is a "state legend?"

Casey has a legendary name in PA politics.

Wormy is being himself/trolling.