Santorum 2012 = McGovern 1984? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 03:02:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Santorum 2012 = McGovern 1984? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Santorum 2012 = McGovern 1984?  (Read 2343 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: February 02, 2011, 04:08:58 PM »

Santorum wasn't crushed in one of the worst Presidential landslides though.  Wink

And what's this nonsense that he's "far too conservative" to win the nomination? How is he out of line with a majority of the other contenders (let alone out of line with a majority of Republicans)?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2011, 09:51:37 PM »

Santorum wasn't crushed in one of the worst Presidential landslides though.  Wink

And what's this nonsense that he's "far too conservative" to win the nomination? How is he out of line with a majority of the other contenders (let alone out of line with a majority of Republicans)?

How many Republican hopefuls have brought dead fetuses home to socialize with their kids or compared gay sex with bestiality?

"To socialize with their kids."

You know, I have no problem debating Santorum's other activities/infamous statements but this is one that makes me too angry. What Santorum did was none of your business so to not only make it into a joke but to exaggerate what actually happened shows how disgustingly pathetic people like yourself really are. I still hope you're never in a situation like Santorum was in and having people critique and mock how you grieved over the loss of an infant.

And once again, we see "joke candidate" Santorum who isn't worthy of any attention, serious consideration, etc. getting plenty of attention. His haters give him more attention than I ever have.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2011, 12:26:41 AM »

Yeah, I don't know what Rick was thinking when he said that. Churchill has nothing on Santorum.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2011, 01:09:03 AM »

I have a tough time seeing how one can completely rule out Palin (in the primary as well as the general) and yet think Santorum is capable of winning both.

Yeah, I agree.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2011, 02:12:10 PM »

And that's your preference. Personally, I wouldn't do it either but to mock him and his family about it especially after what they went through is "bloody disgusting."
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2011, 12:53:32 AM »

I have a tough time seeing how one can completely rule out Palin (in the primary as well as the general) and yet think Santorum is capable of winning both.

No sane individual seriously believes that Santorum is capable of winning one, let alone both.

Glad to see you like Santorum's chances, Winfield.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2011, 01:29:20 AM »

I have a tough time seeing how one can completely rule out Palin (in the primary as well as the general) and yet think Santorum is capable of winning both.

No sane individual seriously believes that Santorum is capable of winning one, let alone both.

Glad to see you like Santorum's chances, Winfield.

Ah, but Phil my witty friend, you seem to be confused.  You see, being perfectly sane, it is clear to me that Santorum's campaign will begin as ludicrous and end as whimsical.


Fair enough, Winfield. At least my candidate stands for something. Is yours a moderate again? Or maybe to the left of Ted Kennedy this week? Reagan Conservative or an "Independent during Reagan - Bush?"
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2011, 01:46:02 AM »

Mitt Romney has the private sector experience I believe is needed in the White House right now. At the end of the day, despite past mistakes and misguided opinions, Mitt Romney has the leadership abilities, charisma, and experience needed to strongly lead the GOP in November and defeat Barack Obama.

Is this the script for Romney's first ad in Iowa?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 12 queries.