PM Series: Question 22 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 04:20:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  PM Series: Question 22 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Union workers should be protected against being fired during strikes.
#1
Agree
 
#2
Usually Agree
 
#3
Neutral
 
#4
Usually Disagree
 
#5
Disagree
 
#6
Critical Issue
 
#7
Not a Critical Issue
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 54

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: PM Series: Question 22  (Read 1148 times)
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

« on: September 23, 2014, 11:26:21 AM »

Agree/Non-Critical

What's the point in a strike if they can fire you? On the other side of things, I also think it's acceptable for businesses to hire temporary replacements during a strike. A strike is meant to be a war of attrition to see who can bear the other's absence without folding as a way to ensure compensation accurately reflects the value of the workers to the company. As such it ought not be rigged in favor of either side. Allowing striking workers to be fired rigs the system in favor of management.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.