Would you have volunteered to fight in the American Civil War? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:25:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Would you have volunteered to fight in the American Civil War? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Yes, for the Union.
 
#2
Yes, for the Confederacy.
 
#3
No, but I'd have gone if my respective side drafted me.
 
#4
No, I'd have actively resisted being drafted.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 75

Author Topic: Would you have volunteered to fight in the American Civil War?  (Read 3313 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« on: April 10, 2015, 11:14:45 PM »
« edited: April 10, 2015, 11:16:22 PM by Senator TNF »

Yes, I'd have signed up with the Union to help wipe out the traitorous slaveholders and help free the slaves. (Normal)
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2015, 06:08:55 AM »
« Edited: April 11, 2015, 06:11:03 AM by Senator TNF »

Yes, I'd have signed up with the Union to help wipe out the traitorous slaveholders and help free the slaves. (Normal)

I thought the US was imperialist and evil?

Again, Marxists have a different understanding of Imperialism than do non-Marxists. Whereas you guys refer to imperialism as a government policy, Marxists understand imperialism as the end result of monopoly capitalism, in effect, the highest stage of capitalist development heretofore developed. See V.I. Lenin, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism for the most robust case for this argument, and Nikolai Bukharin's Imperialism and World Economy if you're interested in getting at the Marxist understanding of imperialism.

Imperialism in Marxism refers to non-competitive, monopoly capitalism. The United States was not a fully capitalist society in 1860 because half of it still engaged in slave-based production. Supporting the Union means wiping out slavery and allowing the full development of capitalism, which is the position that Marx and Engels took and the position that socialists at the time held up as the correct one, and rightfully so.

And get off this crap of implying I'm anti-American. Opposing the foreign policy of the United States in the here and now does not imply that I reject the country of my birth or the things that I has gotten right over the years. You'd do well to avoid such accusations, given that you're one step away from advocating America hitch itself to whatever Israel wants to do in the Middle East as it is. That's far more 'anti-American' that criticizing the post-Civil War foreign policy of the United States ever could be.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.