SENATE BILL: Fair Amendment Procedure Amendment (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 08:57:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Fair Amendment Procedure Amendment (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Fair Amendment Procedure Amendment (Failed)  (Read 3158 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« on: November 10, 2013, 09:28:39 AM »

This will streamline the electoral process and give us one, instead of five, amendment voting booths. It is a common sense reform.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2013, 01:31:08 PM »

Just FTR, a less radical proposal (the "Ratification Amendment") was rejected by three of the five regions and a majority of the people voting barely two months ago. There is absolutely no need for the Senate to pass this, especially because this amendment is clearly anti-region.

And?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2013, 04:01:47 PM »

Except for the extreme reactionaries who would let the Regions write all the laws of Atlasia if they had their way, I cannot fathom opposition to this bill. It is democratic, it is fair, and it is equitable. I ask the Senate to give this amendment a chance.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2013, 08:49:21 PM »

Amendment is HOSTILE.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2013, 07:53:24 AM »

Nay.

A majority is good enough to elect public officials, it should be good enough to amend the Constitution.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2013, 11:19:45 AM »

Just to clarify, how would that work, bore?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2013, 11:57:45 AM »

Just to clarify, how would that work, bore?

The wording may not be perfect, but the intention is that if an amendment gets either 60% of the vote, or the support of two thirds of the regions, it'll pass.

So there would be multiple voting booths open?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2013, 07:28:03 AM »

I'd be much more comfortable with one booth and requiring 2/3rds of the vote rather than multiple voting booths.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2013, 03:58:02 PM »

Nay
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2013, 09:59:29 AM »

Final vote?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2013, 10:49:54 AM »

Aye
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #11 on: November 23, 2013, 08:57:19 PM »

This has enough votes to fail, Senators have 24 hours to change their votes.

It's tied.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2013, 09:44:07 PM »

MUH REGIONAL RIGHTS
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #13 on: November 24, 2013, 09:49:08 PM »

I'll be reintroducing this, fwiw. Maybe the next Senate won't be full of reactionaries who care more about "regoonal rites" than good policy
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.