From your article...
Do you think that is true. Do you think these guys thought the President and his troops would just give up on a law that has already been passed and ruled Constitutional by the Supreme Court? When in the history of our nation has any party done that? What is the precedent for such a move?
My take on the court position was that it, the court, wanted the people to decide if they wanted to keep ACA or not, not that it, ACA is a required right of the constitutional order – a billing of right. And, I didn’t think it is a stumble that ACA is up for defunding or a necessity that the public be liberated from its requirements. ACA standing success will only be of its own making, not by force.
On the debt – because of its size, it is in a place that any current economic rational can’t touch it. One of the things I try to contemplate is, if, service and principle were paid, where would it go? How much of it recycles into corporate investment, private lending or pure spending on a wonder even if it exploits labor? Does velocity of currency paying taxes pay more debt, then, the heat up of inflation – maybe or maybe not? All of this with other considerations is what defines an outcome for all or for few by design, which then brings us back to go. Somebody(s) in the end will decide – is it now or later and, is that I tried to express a conservative bubble or just another conundrum?
