Should companies pay for their worker's healthcare or should the government?

[t_host1]

Problem with poll ?,

Where is the individual check box?

It's kind of like do I want vanilla ice cream on my fresh baked apple pie?

Why is a person(s)wanting to make or do something at his or her own risk liable for someone else's healthcare other than workplace safety?

This equation is more representative of the current situation
 Idea/risk>Workers thinks>business>taxation>government>healthcare=unemployable/unemployment

What are the odds for this coming months end unemployment stats? my guess is 3 to 1, 9.3 or higher for those getting a free ride and pushing 25% including not eligible for subsidies with those carrying the load having more to carry(national debt).

BTW - I don't like the coin toss for who gets the ball, getting the first chance to win during overtime pro football play - opposition must have an opportunity to counter.

[t_host1]

The individual, through taxes.

So, the reported 47% that do not pay taxes now, would then, be paying taxes for their healthcare, correct? That would be helpful...

 ... a couple of things about Snowguy716 points,
they're plenty of resources - capital, energy and materials - and just to clarify, it is Obama and his loyalist who are protecting their self interest by restricting the use of such, which is the criminal aspect of the current regime - 'restrictment of trade" is the charge.

and,

 All future union contracts providing your required benefits will require the union to provide a surety bond(AAA) in the amount of 1/3 of the book value of said company. In the event of a union shop bankruptcy the union bond holder would pay up to 1/3 of the companies losses. For instance, the Ford upcoming Union contract renewal, will require the union to provide a $4B (AAA) bond guarantee payable to Ford accompanying the new contract. Of course, that is if I was running Ford, the only true American built car and truck.