Under federal conflict of laws principles, a judgment in a Region other than Lincoln can not give rise to liability within Lincoln. Lincoln has no personal jurisdiction over a party situate in a different Region, and the filing of a lawsuit outside the territorial bounds of Lincoln is not consent to civil jurisdiction within Lincoln.
In the event that a region passes a law to allow private right of action for anyone to prosecute any/all reproductive health providers or patients engaged in such services, whether the provider or patient resides in that region or any other, this bill is designed to protect potential Lincolnite victims from that liability. This allows recoverable damages and disallows Lincoln judges from issuing a subpoena or summons based on the laws of another region, or country. This does not permit Lincoln to take personal jurisdiction over the laws of any other region. In other words, a private citizen from another region cannot sue a Lincoln-based healthcare provider for providing abortion services.
Further, ignoring the lawful extradition orders of another Region violates the Full Faith and Credit clause of the Constitution. (b) other than (b)(2) is legally dubious at best.
This does not violate any section of the Constitution.
The proposed Section 7b2 restricts the access of health care records by plaintiffs in any potential civil "bounty" case, and allows the victim the right to recover legal costs. I do not see how this is legally dubious.
