Is it an innate thing in the conservative mind to go to conspiracy theories about why they lose?
If you actually read the piece, I think you'll find my concerns reasonable, at least. Please tell me why the "wet ballots" excuse (given to explain long delays in counting on election night)..."holds water".
(As I pointed out in the article, several cities reported their initial numbers very late on election night. The CT Secretary of the State, who supervises the counts, said this was due to "wet ballots". Wait a second....were not all of the polls located indoors?
"Things that make you go 'hmmm....' (C&C Music Factory) )
There isn't some conspiracy. It was pouring and voters were standing/walking outside.
Wet hands + Ballot = Wet Ballot.
It serves as a case for hand counting the vote, if anything.