Swann 2012 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:53:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Swann 2012 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Swann 2012  (Read 2489 times)
danwxman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,532


« on: September 15, 2005, 10:35:48 PM »

I have officially decided to back Team 88.

Why do people keep endorsing Swann as he's only given very little insight into his platform?

He has not laid down specifics, but he has said that he is basically a Ridge Republican, except more pro-life, I think.

According to his website, he seems further to the right then Ridge.
Logged
danwxman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,532


« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2005, 10:44:15 PM »

I have officially decided to back Team 88.

Why do people keep endorsing Swann as he's only given very little insight into his platform?

He has not laid down specifics, but he has said that he is basically a Ridge Republican, except more pro-life, I think.

According to his website, he seems further to the right then Ridge.

I was reading his site the other day, it wasn't too informative.

He seems ultra pro-life, family and anti-gay marriage. Yuck.
Logged
danwxman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,532


« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2005, 10:49:07 PM »

I have officially decided to back Team 88.

Why do people keep endorsing Swann as he's only given very little insight into his platform?

He has not laid down specifics, but he has said that he is basically a Ridge Republican, except more pro-life, I think.

According to his website, he seems further to the right then Ridge.

I was reading his site the other day, it wasn't too informative.

He seems ultra pro-life, family and anti-gay marriage. Yuck.

I didn't really see anything on gay marriage.  I support his stands on abortion and business tax but I don't like his education plan.  Other than that I have no idea what he stands for.

Looks to me like if RVW is overturned he wants to ban abortion in Pennsylvania.
Logged
danwxman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,532


« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2005, 12:12:50 AM »

He seems ultra pro-life, family and anti-gay marriage. Yuck.

yuck, pro-family. What a prude.

Exactly. Pro-family usually means anti gay rights, abortion rights and single people.
Logged
danwxman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,532


« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2005, 11:40:17 PM »


He seems ultra pro-life, family and anti-gay marriage. Yuck.

You have a problem with a baby's right to live, a problem with families, and a problem with marriage as between a man and a woman? 

Of course I support a baby's right to live. I have no problem with families, but parents need to take care of their own kids rather then getting the government to do it for them through censorship and other nonsense. And yea, I do support gay marriage.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.