Who's got the better North Korea policy? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 03:35:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Who's got the better North Korea policy? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which candidate has the best DPRK position?
#1
Bush
 
#2
Kerry
 
#3
Neither
 
#4
Nader
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 34

Author Topic: Who's got the better North Korea policy?  (Read 2976 times)
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
« on: October 01, 2004, 06:15:35 PM »

You think the Chinese want some madman with a bunch of nukes and an unstable country on their border?

Uh, no.

Bilateral talks are a loser.

Then why do the CHinese send so much foreign aid to North Korea?  The PRC has a long alliance with the DPRK, and they have been of no help in these failed six party talks.

How can you assert that bilateral talks are a loser when we have seen two years of six party talks fail?

The Chinese want a buffer state.  If the US says disarm him or we do, and we do so by invading, the Chinese will cut Kim off.  They are already upset that the US now has bases in the borderng -istans.  If they thought they were about to lose N. Korea they would take action.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 16 queries.