LA Times poll thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 07:09:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
  LA Times poll thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: LA Times poll thread  (Read 6906 times)
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
« on: June 17, 2004, 05:09:24 PM »

The two are NOT mutually exclusive.  You do not throw out peopel if you are close to a reasonable split in party ID, say a 5% Dem advantage.  Might be a bit off, but not so far teh poll needs tweaking.

Now, when assembling a representative sample a 10% or more Dem advantage is so far out of line as to rule out a true representative sample.  A 14% advantage is downright indefensible.  At that point you have clearly oversampled one side and should adjust your numbers for it, or throw out the poll as garbage.

If every other piece of methodology is good, a slight bias one way or the other will not make a huge difference.  If your difference is too big, the rest cannot compensate for it.
Logged
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2004, 05:53:04 PM »

In part because the SUSA poll used voter self identification, there is no registry to compare that to.  Survey USA may have a grievous error, or it may have found a trend for FL voters to self identify as Reps.  More polling is needed to check this, which is one of the very first thing Vorlon says.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 15 queries.