Should there be a revote? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 09:31:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Should there be a revote? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Where should there be/should there have been a revote?
#1
Washington Governor 2004 yes, Florida 2000, no
 
#2
Washington Governor 2004 no, Florida 2000, yes
 
#3
Both yes
 
#4
Both no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 59

Author Topic: Should there be a revote?  (Read 15563 times)
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
« on: January 06, 2005, 10:17:06 PM »

We have a statewide revote in NC courtesy of our friendly neighborhood democrats when they lost by 2000+ votes because roughly 4000 votes were lost due to poll worker error.  The poll workers will not be working the polls ever again.

Personally I think the revote in NC is a bad idea, especially since we can identify all the people who voted but did not have their vote counted. 

What should happen in WA is  the disputed ballots should be examined and the ones that should not have been counted should be removed.  Same goes for the four other counties that are having trouble.  If this cannot be done that county revotes, only people who showed up on Nov. 2nd can participate.

And Logan, along with any other county executive who screwed things up, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for election fraud and forced to pay as much as he can for the revote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.