What happens if Paul wins Iowa?

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Whether or not he is a racist, he definitely supports racist policies, so that attack is not entirely invalid.

What racist policies does he support? Or are you one of those people who believe states rights is automatically racist? And who cares what his racial views are? You can't look me in the eye and say Mitch McConnell or Harry Reid are not racist. All politicians are. But they are not stupid enough to enact openly racist policies. 

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

And who cares what his racial views are? You can't look me in the eye and say Mitch McConnell or Harry Reid are not racist. All politicians are.

...what?

Do you honestly think that the "good 'ole boys" are not racist? The Richard Shelby types?

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

President Paul wouldn't be able to accomplish anything meaningful (or at least nothing that would be inline with his campaign rhetoric). He'd have large majorities of both of the parties in the House and Senate against him on a whole range of issues.

you're ignoring the areas (such as war and occupation) than are outside of civilian control.

Paul would be the Commander in Chief. He could end the wars right then and their. Of course, he will be sensible, and phase it out.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

President Paul wouldn't be able to accomplish anything meaningful (or at least nothing that would be inline with his campaign rhetoric). He'd have large majorities of both of the parties in the House and Senate against him on a whole range of issues.

you're ignoring the areas (such as war and occupation) than are outside of civilian control.

Paul would be the Commander in Chief. He could end the wars right then and their. Of course, he will be sensible, and phase it out.

And probably risk being impeached by his own party.

At the end of the day, the GOP establishment is concerned about themselves, and wont impeach Paul over unpopular wars..That would be a blatant slap in the face to the citizens, and they are smart enough to know that.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

President Paul wouldn't be able to accomplish anything meaningful (or at least nothing that would be inline with his campaign rhetoric). He'd have large majorities of both of the parties in the House and Senate against him on a whole range of issues.

you're ignoring the areas (such as war and occupation) than are outside of civilian control.

Paul would be the Commander in Chief. He could end the wars right then and their. Of course, he will be sensible, and phase it out.

So exactly the same as Obama. Cool.

Besides Libya, Obama's FP is decent.