20-Sep-2004: Judgment Day for CBS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 09:56:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  20-Sep-2004: Judgment Day for CBS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 20-Sep-2004: Judgment Day for CBS  (Read 5104 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,936


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: September 20, 2004, 01:30:30 AM »
« edited: September 20, 2004, 01:31:47 AM by jfern »

CBS: "We were decieved."

Yeah, you and me both, pal.

I wonder when Jfern will be apologizing for his efforts to aid the deceptive attack on President Bush.

Where are the real documents, then?
The military did a whitewash on Bush's documents in 1997 or so.
His secretary verified that the content of these documents was accurate.

But ignore that all, the WH released these documents.
Another WH intelligence failure.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,936


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2004, 01:59:56 AM »

The format really is the heart of the story, regardless of CBS attempts to steer us otherwise.  They're trying to get us to believe a story that was presented with false evidence.  If they continue to pursue Bush's Guard records, it's very obvious that they're trying to cover their own mistake.  They should drop it: we're all tired of hearing about 1968-1972.  

Here's why I focus on the format: If an archaeologist told me that he'd found the lost histories of the Emperor Claudius, I'd be tremendously excited. If he presented me with those histories, and they were scribbled on the back of a child's menu from Sirloin Stockade, I would instantly lose faith in the content of what was written. The format would have told me that the content was junk. Likewise, the forged format of the CBS documents precludes us from focusing on any potential content.

Besides, questions about Bush's service have been floating around for years now.  Don't you think we've all made up our minds to either support or oppose him already?  Dan Rather-biased digging up an old story isn't going to change my vote.

But what if Claudius' secretary said the information was accurate? i
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,936


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2004, 02:40:28 AM »

But what if Claudius' secretary said the information was accurate? i

That is what is known as hearsay.  And there is other hearsay which contradicts the secretary's account.

Without the authenticity of the documents, there is nothing new to this story.  

The only “news” is that someone, with contacts to the Kerry Campaign, committed a felony by forging government documents.  That forgery was used  by a major network in an attempt to bring down the office of the President of the United States during a time of war.  


Who cares about felonies? The Bush adminstration committed treason with Valarie Plame.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.